Archive for December, 2011

Energy Saving News

LEDs offer a brighter future, says report

Tuesday, December 20th, 2011

A field trial of LED light fittings in social housing says the new technology can deliver huge energy savings, reduce costs and makes residents feel safer.

The study, carried out by the Energy Saving Trust (EST), measured the performance of more than 4,250 LED light fittings installed at 35 sites.

The EST said it carried out the trial because an increasing number of LED lights were now commercially available.

It is predicted the technology could dominate the lighting market by 2015.

“We like to test things in-situ in order to understand their real performance rather than rely on manufacturers’ claims,” explained James Russill, EST’s technical development manager.

But, he added: “We are at one of those rare times when there is a revolution, I think it is fair to say, within the lighting sector.

“LEDs promise to be the way forward for the whole sector, to be honest. There are so many benefits: they can be smaller, brighter; it is one of those rare technologies where the trial has shown it performs better than the lighting systems it is replacing but, at the same time, using less energy.”

LED appreciation

At the 35 sites in the field trial, the authors of the Lit Up report calculated that the LED fittings saved more than three million kilowatt hours (kWh) each year when compared with the previous lighting.

Continue reading the main story

What is LED lighting?

Communal area with standard lighting (left) and LED fittings (right) (Image: Energy Saving Trust)

Light-emitting diodes have been around for years.

Traditionally, they have been used as indicators on electrical devices, such as standby lights on TVs. This was because LEDs were only available in red, but recent advances means that other colours are now available, and the light emitted is much brighter.

White light (used for general lighting) using LEDs can be created via a number of techniques. One example is mixing red, green and blue LEDs.

It is suggested that LEDs can last for up to 100,000 hours, compared with the 1,000 hours of traditional incandescent light-bulbs and compact fluorescent lamps’ (CFLs) 15,000 hours.

The technology is also much more energy efficient, using up to 90% less energy than incandescent bulbs.

The long lifespans and low energy use make LEDs economically attractive because even though the fittings cost more, the running and maintenance bills are lower.

“The trial has shown that the installation of LED light fittings can be used to maintain or enhance light levels, and in both cases can generate energy savings,” the report’s authors wrote.

They added: “The increase in colour temperature typically produced by LEDs also improved the environments monitored in the field trial, a factor much appreciated by the social housing tenants.

“With the rising price of electricity, the high efficiencies of LED lighting technology will make it an even more attractive investment in the years ahead.”

Mr Russill said that he thought that there would be a natural take-up for the new lighting systems.

“I am already aware of many people that have bought LEDs without any subsidy or incentive,” He told BBC News.

“As with any new technology, there is a higher initial cost – these products are new to market – but people seem to be looking beyond that and seeing they last much longer.

“LEDs will take over the market in due course because I think they are such better products, but I do think introducing them into a subsidy scheme would be a real benefit to speed things up,” he added.

As well as the technical benefits, Mr Russill said feedback from tenants involved in the trial highlighted social benefits too.

“Some of the comments we had was that the light was fresher, brighter and more like daylight,” he said.

“Generally, the feedback was that the lighting make it a nicer place to live.”

The brighter light levels also had a positive impact on people’s sense of security, he observed.

“We also did fit some lighting in external area, such as balcony areas and car parks.

“People also did comment and did make the areas outside feel like a safer environment because it was better lit.

“That also applied to stairwells as well which could be perceived to be an area where shadowy figures like to hang out.”

2010-2011 CRC League Table

Thursday, December 8th, 2011

Manchester United Tops CRC Performance League Table while Virgin Atlantic is amongst worst performers.

The Environment Agency has published its first Carbon Reduction Commitment Performance League Table (CRC League Table) ranking 2,000 registered organisations on how they manage their business electricity usage and carbon emissions. According to EA’s data more than 60% of the registered companies have installed smart meters or gained good energy management and Carbon Trust accreditation.

2010-2011 CRC League Table

Out of the 2,000 organisations 22 ranked joint first with a weighted score of 202.95 while 800 organisations ranked in the lowest possible position of the CRC League Table with a weighted score of 402.

At the top highlights to Red Football Limited, popularly known as Manchester United, energy regulator OFGEM, UBS, British American Tabacco and the Department of Energy & Climate Change.

On the opposite side of the table there are well known organisations that failed to improve their business energy efficiency or cut down on their carbon emissions. They include Centrica, Virgin Atlantic, Peugeot, the Zoological Society and London and Zurich Financial Services.

The Environment Agency did not disclose information on those organisations that failed to comply with the legislation and will now face fines starting from £45,000.

How the PLT is compiled

The Performance League Table (PLT) ranks the relative performance of the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme participant against the three weighted metrics: Early Action Metric, Absolute Metric and Growth Metric. Participants with the same weighted score are sorted alphabetically.

Weighted Score – The sum of the score for each metric multiplied by the weighting for that metric. The weighting applied to each metric is dependent on the compliance year to which the Performance League Table relates. The higher the score the better the ranking in the PLT.

Emissions (Tonnes of CO2) – Your “CRC Emissions”. These are the CO2 emissions associated with the CRC supplies of a participant for an annual reporting year.

Early Action Metric (%) – The average percentage of i) the proportion of non-mandatory CRC electricity or gas supplies which are measured through voluntarily installed “automatic meter reading” meters or dynamic supply in year 1 and ii) CRC emission coverage by the Carbon Trust Standard or equivalent.

Absolute Emissions Metric (%) – The percentage change in the CRC Emissions of a participant (not applicable for the first reporting year).

Growth Metric (%) – The percentage change in CRC Emissions per unit turnover or revenue expenditure for an annual reporting year (not applicable for the first reporting year).

Those interested in the CRC League Table can download the PLT here.

If you would like more information on our range of business energy services or would simply like to find out how we could benefit your business, simply call our energy team today on 0203 489 2648 or request a call back at time to suit. contact us